// BENCHMARK

FullStackBench benchmark

AI model leaderboard for the FullStackBench benchmark. Compare how large language models score on FullStackBench, see the full ranking, and understand what this AI benchmark measures. MiniMax-M1-80k currently leads with 68.3%. Full-stack code generation benchmark covering 11 real-world programming domains.

Leaderboard

# Model Organization Score Variant Source
#1 MiniMax-M1-80k MiniMax 68.3% 16 samples official โ†—
#2 MiniMax-M1-40k MiniMax 67.6% 16 samples official โ†—
#3 Ling-1T Ant Group 56.55% pass@1 official โ†—
#4 DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus DeepSeek 55.48% non-thinking-cited-ling-1t official โ†—
#5 Kimi K2 Moonshot 54% instruct-0905-cited-ling-1t official โ†—
#6 GPT-5 OpenAI 50.92% main-cited-ling-1t official โ†—
#7 gemini-2.5-pro Google DeepMind 48.19% lowthink-cited-ling-1t official โ†—

Frequently asked questions about FullStackBench

What is the FullStackBench benchmark?

Full-stack code generation benchmark covering 11 real-world programming domains.

How is the FullStackBench benchmark scored?

FullStackBench is scored using the pass@1 (%) metric, where a higher score is better. The maximum achievable score is 100.000. GenAIList aggregates reported scores from model providers and papers into a single ranked leaderboard.

Which AI model scores highest on FullStackBench?

As of the latest reported scores on GenAIList, MiniMax-M1-80k achieves the highest result on FullStackBench with a score of 68.3%.

Is a higher FullStackBench score better?

Yes. On FullStackBench a higher score indicates better performance, so models near the top of the leaderboard are the strongest.