// COMPARISON

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

A head-to-head benchmark comparison of Claude 3.5 Sonnet across 22 evaluations.

The models

Benchmark comparison

Benchmark Claude 3.5 Sonnet
code
HumanEval 93.7%
LiveCodeBench v5 38.9%
LiveCodeBench v6 37.2%
MBPP+ 75.1%
general
ArenaHard 87.6%
IFEval 90.1%
MMLU 88.7%
MMLU-Pro 78%
knowledge
SuperGPQA 48.2
math
AIME 2024 16%
AIME 2025 7.4%
GSM8K 96.9%
MATH 74.1%
MATH-500 78.3%
multimodal
ChartQA 90.8%
DocVQA 95.200
MMMU 70.4%
MathVista 67.7%
reasoning
DROP 88.8%
GPQA Diamond 65%
safety
C-SimpleQA 56.8%
SimpleQA 28.1%

Best result per row highlighted in cyan. Each benchmark links to its definition and sources; each model links to its full scorecard.

Frequently asked questions

Which of these models is best for coding? β–Ά

Claude 3.5 Sonnet has the strongest result on HumanEval among the models compared here. See the code-category rows in the table for the full picture.

How many benchmarks are compared? β–Ά

This comparison covers 22 benchmarks on which at least one of the selected models has a published score.

Where do the benchmark scores come from? β–Ά

Scores are aggregated from official model cards, technical reports and standard public evaluations, and link back to each benchmark's source. They are updated as new results are published.

Explore further

Build a different comparison

Models (0 selected)

Benchmarks (auto)

Select at least two models.