// COMPARISON

Claude Sonnet 4

A head-to-head benchmark comparison of Claude Sonnet 4 across 16 evaluations.

The models

Language Proprietary
Params
β€”
Context
β€”
Released
May 2025

Claude Sonnet 4 can understand nuanced instructions and context, recognize and correct its own mistakes, and create sophisticated analysis and insights from com.

Full Claude Sonnet 4 specs β†’

Benchmark comparison

Benchmark Claude Sonnet 4
agentic
BrowseComp 14.7%
BrowseComp-Zh 29.1
GAIA 68.3
TAU-bench Airline 60%
TAU-bench Retail 80.5%
Terminal-Bench 2.0 35.5%
WebWalkerQA 61.7
xbench-DeepSearch 65
code
SWE-bench Verified 70.4%
general
IFEval 88.7%
MMLU 91.9%
MultiChallenge 55.3%
long-context
Frames 80.7
reasoning
Humanity's Last Exam 20.3%
safety
SimpleQA 18.5%
tool-use
BFCL v3 75.2%

Best result per row highlighted in cyan. Each benchmark links to its definition and sources; each model links to its full scorecard.

Frequently asked questions

Which of these models is best for coding? β–Ά

Claude Sonnet 4 has the strongest result on SWE-bench Verified among the models compared here. See the code-category rows in the table for the full picture.

How many benchmarks are compared? β–Ά

This comparison covers 16 benchmarks on which at least one of the selected models has a published score.

Where do the benchmark scores come from? β–Ά

Scores are aggregated from official model cards, technical reports and standard public evaluations, and link back to each benchmark's source. They are updated as new results are published.

Explore further

Build a different comparison

Models (0 selected)

Benchmarks (auto)

Select at least two models.