// COMPARISON

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp

A head-to-head benchmark comparison of DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp across 14 evaluations.

The models

Benchmark comparison

Benchmark DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
agentic
BrowseComp 40.1%
BrowseComp-Zh 47.9
Terminal-Bench 2.0 37.7%
code
Aider Polyglot 74.5%
Codeforces Elo 2,121
LiveCodeBench 74.1%
SWE-bench Verified 67.8%
coding
SWE-Bench Multilingual 57.9
general
MMLU-Pro 85%
math
AIME 2025 89.3%
HMMT February 2025 83.6%
reasoning
GPQA Diamond 79.9%
Humanity's Last Exam 19.8%
safety
SimpleQA 97.1%

Best result per row highlighted in cyan. Each benchmark links to its definition and sources; each model links to its full scorecard.

Frequently asked questions

Which of these models is best for coding? β–Ά

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp has the strongest result on Aider Polyglot among the models compared here. See the code-category rows in the table for the full picture.

How many benchmarks are compared? β–Ά

This comparison covers 14 benchmarks on which at least one of the selected models has a published score.

Where do the benchmark scores come from? β–Ά

Scores are aggregated from official model cards, technical reports and standard public evaluations, and link back to each benchmark's source. They are updated as new results are published.

Explore further

Build a different comparison

Models (0 selected)

Benchmarks (auto)

Select at least two models.