// COMPARISON

DeepSeek V4-Flash

A head-to-head benchmark comparison of DeepSeek V4-Flash across 5 evaluations.

The models

Benchmark comparison

Benchmark DeepSeek V4-Flash
code
HumanEval 91.3%
SWE-bench Verified 72.1%
general
MMLU-Pro 78.9%
math
AIME 2025 85.4%
reasoning
GPQA Diamond 78.6%

Best result per row highlighted in cyan. Each benchmark links to its definition and sources; each model links to its full scorecard.

Frequently asked questions

Which of these models is best for coding? β–Ά

DeepSeek V4-Flash has the strongest result on HumanEval among the models compared here. See the code-category rows in the table for the full picture.

How many benchmarks are compared? β–Ά

This comparison covers 5 benchmarks on which at least one of the selected models has a published score.

Where do the benchmark scores come from? β–Ά

Scores are aggregated from official model cards, technical reports and standard public evaluations, and link back to each benchmark's source. They are updated as new results are published.

Explore further

Build a different comparison

Models (0 selected)

Benchmarks (auto)

Select at least two models.