// COMPARISON

Gemma 2 9B

A head-to-head benchmark comparison of Gemma 2 9B across 23 evaluations.

The models

Language Open (Restricted)
Params
9B
Context
β€”
Released
Jun 2024

Now we’re officially releasing Gemma 2 to researchers and developers globally. Available in both 9 billion (9B) and 27 billion (27B) parameter sizes, Gemma 2 is.

Full Gemma 2 9B specs β†’

Benchmark comparison

Benchmark Gemma 2 9B
code
HumanEval 71.7%
HumanEval+ 67%
MBPP 69.3%
general
AlpacaEval 2 43.7%
ArenaHard 43.6%
IFEval 69.9%
LiveBench 32.1
MMLU 74.6%
MMLU-Pro 50.1%
MMMLU 63.8%
knowledge
AGIEval 57.3
ARC-Challenge 89.8
TriviaQA 81.8
math
GSM8K 84.9%
MATH 50.9%
MGSM 75.1
reasoning
BIG-Bench Hard 63.5%
DROP 63%
GPQA Diamond 29.2%
HellaSwag 87.3
PIQA 83.7
Winogrande 78.8
safety
TruthfulQA 76.6%

Best result per row highlighted in cyan. Each benchmark links to its definition and sources; each model links to its full scorecard.

Frequently asked questions

Which of these models is best for coding? β–Ά

Gemma 2 9B has the strongest result on HumanEval among the models compared here. See the code-category rows in the table for the full picture.

How many benchmarks are compared? β–Ά

This comparison covers 23 benchmarks on which at least one of the selected models has a published score.

Where do the benchmark scores come from? β–Ά

Scores are aggregated from official model cards, technical reports and standard public evaluations, and link back to each benchmark's source. They are updated as new results are published.

Explore further

Build a different comparison

Models (0 selected)

Benchmarks (auto)

Select at least two models.