// COMPARISON

Gemma 4 26B

A head-to-head benchmark comparison of Gemma 4 26B across 3 evaluations.

The models

Benchmark comparison

Benchmark Gemma 4 26B
code
HumanEval 79.8%
general
MMLU-Pro 70.1%
reasoning
GPQA Diamond 55.9%

Best result per row highlighted in cyan. Each benchmark links to its definition and sources; each model links to its full scorecard.

Frequently asked questions

Which of these models is best for coding? ▶

Gemma 4 26B has the strongest result on HumanEval among the models compared here. See the code-category rows in the table for the full picture.

How many benchmarks are compared? ▶

This comparison covers 3 benchmarks on which at least one of the selected models has a published score.

Where do the benchmark scores come from? ▶

Scores are aggregated from official model cards, technical reports and standard public evaluations, and link back to each benchmark's source. They are updated as new results are published.

Explore further

→ Gemma 4 26B → AI benchmarks leaderboard → Build a different comparison
Build a different comparison

Models (0 selected)

Benchmarks (auto)

Select at least two models.