// COMPARISON

GPT-4o mini

A head-to-head benchmark comparison of GPT-4o mini across 17 evaluations.

The models

Language Proprietary
Params
β€”
Context
β€”
Released
Jul 2024

OpenAI is committed to making intelligence as broadly accessible as possible. Today, we're announcing GPT-4o mini, our most cost-efficient small model. We expec.

Full GPT-4o mini specs β†’

Benchmark comparison

Benchmark GPT-4o mini
code
HumanEval 86.6%
MBPP 84.1%
general
ArenaHard 75%
MMLU 77.2%
MMLU-Pro 62.8%
MMMLU 72.9%
knowledge
ARC-Challenge 93.5
math
GSM8K 91.3%
MATH 70.2%
MGSM 81.7
multimodal
MMMU 59.4%
reasoning
BIG-Bench Hard 80.4%
GPQA Diamond 41.1%
HellaSwag 87.1
PIQA 88.7
Winogrande 76.9
safety
TruthfulQA 78.2%

Best result per row highlighted in cyan. Each benchmark links to its definition and sources; each model links to its full scorecard.

Frequently asked questions

Which of these models is best for coding? β–Ά

GPT-4o mini has the strongest result on HumanEval among the models compared here. See the code-category rows in the table for the full picture.

How many benchmarks are compared? β–Ά

This comparison covers 17 benchmarks on which at least one of the selected models has a published score.

Where do the benchmark scores come from? β–Ά

Scores are aggregated from official model cards, technical reports and standard public evaluations, and link back to each benchmark's source. They are updated as new results are published.

Explore further

Build a different comparison

Models (0 selected)

Benchmarks (auto)

Select at least two models.