// COMPARISON

Granite 3.1 8B

A head-to-head benchmark comparison of Granite 3.1 8B across 10 evaluations.

The models

Language Open (Restricted)
Params
8.1B
Context
β€”
Released
Dec 2024

Model Summary: Granite-3.1-8B-Base extends the context length of Granite-3.0-8B-Base from 4K to 128K using a progressive training strategy by increasing the sup.

Full Granite 3.1 8B specs β†’

Benchmark comparison

Benchmark Granite 3.1 8B
code
HumanEval 89.63%
HumanEval+ 85.79%
general
AlpacaEval 2 30.34%
ArenaHard 37.58%
IFEval 73.2%
MMLU 66.77%
math
GSM8K 79.15%
reasoning
BIG-Bench Hard 68.55%
DROP 50.78%
safety
TruthfulQA 65.84%

Best result per row highlighted in cyan. Each benchmark links to its definition and sources; each model links to its full scorecard.

Frequently asked questions

Which of these models is best for coding? β–Ά

Granite 3.1 8B has the strongest result on HumanEval among the models compared here. See the code-category rows in the table for the full picture.

How many benchmarks are compared? β–Ά

This comparison covers 10 benchmarks on which at least one of the selected models has a published score.

Where do the benchmark scores come from? β–Ά

Scores are aggregated from official model cards, technical reports and standard public evaluations, and link back to each benchmark's source. They are updated as new results are published.

Explore further

Build a different comparison

Models (0 selected)

Benchmarks (auto)

Select at least two models.