// COMPARISON

Granite-4.0-H-Micro

A head-to-head benchmark comparison of Granite-4.0-H-Micro across 19 evaluations.

The models

Language Open (Restricted)
Params
3B
Context
β€”
Released
Oct 2025

We’re launching Granite 4, the next generation of IBM language models. Granite 4.0 features a new hybrid Mamba/transformer architecture that greatly reduces mem.

Full Granite-4.0-H-Micro specs β†’

Benchmark comparison

Benchmark Granite-4.0-H-Micro
code
HumanEval 81%
HumanEval+ 75%
MBPP 73%
MBPP+ 64%
coding
BigCodeBench 37.9
MultiPL-E 49.46
general
AlpacaEval 2 31.49%
ArenaHard 36.15%
IFEval 86.94%
MMLU 67.43%
MMLU-Pro 43.48%
MMMLU 55.19%
knowledge
AGIEval 59
INCLUDE 50.51
math
GSM8K 81.35%
MGSM 44.48
reasoning
BIG-Bench Hard 69.36%
GPQA Diamond 32.15%
tool-use
BFCL v3 57.56%

Best result per row highlighted in cyan. Each benchmark links to its definition and sources; each model links to its full scorecard.

Frequently asked questions

Which of these models is best for coding? β–Ά

Granite-4.0-H-Micro has the strongest result on HumanEval among the models compared here. See the code-category rows in the table for the full picture.

How many benchmarks are compared? β–Ά

This comparison covers 19 benchmarks on which at least one of the selected models has a published score.

Where do the benchmark scores come from? β–Ά

Scores are aggregated from official model cards, technical reports and standard public evaluations, and link back to each benchmark's source. They are updated as new results are published.

Explore further

Build a different comparison

Models (0 selected)

Benchmarks (auto)

Select at least two models.