// COMPARISON

Granite-4.0-H-Tiny

A head-to-head benchmark comparison of Granite-4.0-H-Tiny across 19 evaluations.

The models

Language Open (Restricted)
Params
7B
Context
β€”
Released
Oct 2025

We’re launching Granite 4, the next generation of IBM language models. Granite 4.0 features a new hybrid Mamba/transformer architecture that greatly reduces mem.

Full Granite-4.0-H-Tiny specs β†’

Benchmark comparison

Benchmark Granite-4.0-H-Tiny
code
HumanEval 83%
HumanEval+ 76%
MBPP 80%
MBPP+ 69%
coding
BigCodeBench 41.06
MultiPL-E 55.83
general
AlpacaEval 2 30.61%
ArenaHard 35.75%
IFEval 84.78%
MMLU 68.65%
MMLU-Pro 44.94%
MMMLU 61.87%
knowledge
AGIEval 62.15
INCLUDE 53.12
math
GSM8K 84.69%
MGSM 45.36
reasoning
BIG-Bench Hard 66.34%
GPQA Diamond 32.59%
tool-use
BFCL v3 57.65%

Best result per row highlighted in cyan. Each benchmark links to its definition and sources; each model links to its full scorecard.

Frequently asked questions

Which of these models is best for coding? β–Ά

Granite-4.0-H-Tiny has the strongest result on HumanEval among the models compared here. See the code-category rows in the table for the full picture.

How many benchmarks are compared? β–Ά

This comparison covers 19 benchmarks on which at least one of the selected models has a published score.

Where do the benchmark scores come from? β–Ά

Scores are aggregated from official model cards, technical reports and standard public evaluations, and link back to each benchmark's source. They are updated as new results are published.

Explore further

Build a different comparison

Models (0 selected)

Benchmarks (auto)

Select at least two models.