// COMPARISON

IBM Granite 4.1

A head-to-head benchmark comparison of IBM Granite 4.1 across 7 evaluations.

The models

Benchmark comparison

Benchmark IBM Granite 4.1
code
HumanEval 85.37%
MBPP 87.3%
general
IFEval 87.06%
MMLU 73.84%
MMLU-Pro 55.99%
safety
SimpleQA 4.82%
tool-use
BFCL v3 68.27%

Best result per row highlighted in cyan. Each benchmark links to its definition and sources; each model links to its full scorecard.

Frequently asked questions

Which of these models is best for coding? β–Ά

IBM Granite 4.1 has the strongest result on HumanEval among the models compared here. See the code-category rows in the table for the full picture.

How many benchmarks are compared? β–Ά

This comparison covers 7 benchmarks on which at least one of the selected models has a published score.

Where do the benchmark scores come from? β–Ά

Scores are aggregated from official model cards, technical reports and standard public evaluations, and link back to each benchmark's source. They are updated as new results are published.

Explore further

Build a different comparison

Models (0 selected)

Benchmarks (auto)

Select at least two models.