// COMPARISON

Jamba

A head-to-head benchmark comparison of Jamba across 8 evaluations.

The models

Language Open (Restricted)
Params
51.6B
Context
β€”
Released
Mar 2024

We present Jamba, a new base large language model based on a novel hybrid Transformer-Mamba mixture-of-experts (MoE) architecture. Specifically, Jamba interleav.

Full Jamba specs β†’

Benchmark comparison

Benchmark Jamba
code
HumanEval 29.3%
general
MMLU 67.4%
knowledge
ARC-Challenge 64.4
math
GSM8K 59.9%
reasoning
BIG-Bench Hard 45.4%
HellaSwag 87.1
Winogrande 82.5
safety
TruthfulQA 46.4%

Best result per row highlighted in cyan. Each benchmark links to its definition and sources; each model links to its full scorecard.

Frequently asked questions

Which of these models is best for coding? β–Ά

Jamba has the strongest result on HumanEval among the models compared here. See the code-category rows in the table for the full picture.

How many benchmarks are compared? β–Ά

This comparison covers 8 benchmarks on which at least one of the selected models has a published score.

Where do the benchmark scores come from? β–Ά

Scores are aggregated from official model cards, technical reports and standard public evaluations, and link back to each benchmark's source. They are updated as new results are published.

Explore further

Build a different comparison

Models (0 selected)

Benchmarks (auto)

Select at least two models.