// COMPARISON

Llama 3-8B

A head-to-head benchmark comparison of Llama 3-8B across 15 evaluations.

The models

Language Open (Restricted)
Params
8B
Context
β€”
Released
Apr 2024

Today, we’re introducing Meta Llama 3, the next generation of our state-of-the-art open source large language model. Llama 3 models will soon be available on AW.

Full Llama 3-8B specs β†’

Benchmark comparison

Benchmark Llama 3-8B
code
HumanEval 33.5%
MBPP 53.9%
general
C-Eval 49.5%
IFEval 14.55%
MMLU 66.7%
MMLU-Pro 35.4%
knowledge
ARC-Challenge 60.24
CMMLU 50.8
math
GSM8K 56%
MATH 20.5%
reasoning
BIG-Bench Hard 57.7%
GPQA Diamond 25.8%
HellaSwag 82.23
Winogrande 78.45
safety
TruthfulQA 42.93%

Best result per row highlighted in cyan. Each benchmark links to its definition and sources; each model links to its full scorecard.

Frequently asked questions

Which of these models is best for coding? β–Ά

Llama 3-8B has the strongest result on HumanEval among the models compared here. See the code-category rows in the table for the full picture.

How many benchmarks are compared? β–Ά

This comparison covers 15 benchmarks on which at least one of the selected models has a published score.

Where do the benchmark scores come from? β–Ά

Scores are aggregated from official model cards, technical reports and standard public evaluations, and link back to each benchmark's source. They are updated as new results are published.

Explore further

Build a different comparison

Models (0 selected)

Benchmarks (auto)

Select at least two models.