// COMPARISON

LongCat-Flash

A head-to-head benchmark comparison of LongCat-Flash across 13 evaluations.

The models

Language Open (Restricted)
Params
560B
Context
β€”
Released
Sep 2025

We introduce LongCat-Flash, a 560-billion-parameter Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) language model designed for both computational efficiency and advanced agentic capa.

Full LongCat-Flash specs β†’

Benchmark comparison

Benchmark LongCat-Flash
agentic
Terminal-Bench 2.0 39.51%
code
HumanEval+ 67.8%
LiveCodeBench 48.02%
MBPP+ 81.27%
SWE-bench Verified 60.4%
general
IFEval 89.65%
MMLU 89.71%
MMLU-Pro 82.68%
math
AIME 2024 70.42%
AIME 2025 61.25%
MATH-500 96.4%
reasoning
GPQA Diamond 73.23%
ZebraLogic 89.3%

Best result per row highlighted in cyan. Each benchmark links to its definition and sources; each model links to its full scorecard.

Frequently asked questions

Which of these models is best for coding? β–Ά

LongCat-Flash has the strongest result on HumanEval+ among the models compared here. See the code-category rows in the table for the full picture.

How many benchmarks are compared? β–Ά

This comparison covers 13 benchmarks on which at least one of the selected models has a published score.

Where do the benchmark scores come from? β–Ά

Scores are aggregated from official model cards, technical reports and standard public evaluations, and link back to each benchmark's source. They are updated as new results are published.

Explore further

Build a different comparison

Models (0 selected)

Benchmarks (auto)

Select at least two models.