// COMPARISON

Mistral NeMo

A head-to-head benchmark comparison of Mistral NeMo across 16 evaluations.

The models

Language Open (Restricted)
Params
12B
Context
β€”
Released
Jul 2024

Mistral NeMo: our new best small model. A state-of-the-art 12B model with 128k context length, built in collaboration with NVIDIA, and released under the Apache.

Full Mistral NeMo specs β†’

Benchmark comparison

Benchmark Mistral NeMo
code
HumanEval 63.4%
MBPP 68.1%
general
ArenaHard 39.4%
MMLU 67.2%
MMLU-Pro 40.7%
MMMLU 58.9%
knowledge
ARC-Challenge 84.8
math
GSM8K 84.2%
MATH 31.2%
MGSM 63.3
reasoning
BIG-Bench Hard 60.2%
GPQA Diamond 28.6%
HellaSwag 76.7
PIQA 83.5
Winogrande 70.4
safety
TruthfulQA 68.1%

Best result per row highlighted in cyan. Each benchmark links to its definition and sources; each model links to its full scorecard.

Frequently asked questions

Which of these models is best for coding? β–Ά

Mistral NeMo has the strongest result on HumanEval among the models compared here. See the code-category rows in the table for the full picture.

How many benchmarks are compared? β–Ά

This comparison covers 16 benchmarks on which at least one of the selected models has a published score.

Where do the benchmark scores come from? β–Ά

Scores are aggregated from official model cards, technical reports and standard public evaluations, and link back to each benchmark's source. They are updated as new results are published.

Explore further

Build a different comparison

Models (0 selected)

Benchmarks (auto)

Select at least two models.