// COMPARISON

Mistral Small 3.1

A head-to-head benchmark comparison of Mistral Small 3.1 across 14 evaluations.

The models

Benchmark comparison

Benchmark Mistral Small 3.1
code
HumanEval+ 88.99%
MBPP+ 74.63%
general
ArenaHard v2 19.56
MMLU 80.62%
MMLU-Pro 66.76%
math
MATH 69.3%
multimodal
ChartQA 86.24%
DocVQA 94.080
MMMU 64%
MMMU-Pro (Standard) 45.8
MMMU-Pro (Vision) 42.4
MathVista 68.91%
reasoning
GPQA Diamond 45.96%
safety
SimpleQA 10.43%

Best result per row highlighted in cyan. Each benchmark links to its definition and sources; each model links to its full scorecard.

Frequently asked questions

Which of these models is best for coding? β–Ά

Mistral Small 3.1 has the strongest result on HumanEval+ among the models compared here. See the code-category rows in the table for the full picture.

How many benchmarks are compared? β–Ά

This comparison covers 14 benchmarks on which at least one of the selected models has a published score.

Where do the benchmark scores come from? β–Ά

Scores are aggregated from official model cards, technical reports and standard public evaluations, and link back to each benchmark's source. They are updated as new results are published.

Explore further

Build a different comparison

Models (0 selected)

Benchmarks (auto)

Select at least two models.