// COMPARISON

Qwen2.5 Instruct (72B)

A head-to-head benchmark comparison of Qwen2.5 Instruct (72B) across 16 evaluations.

The models

Benchmark comparison

Benchmark Qwen2.5 Instruct (72B)
code
HumanEval 94%
HumanEval+ 90.8%
MBPP+ 77%
general
AlpacaEval 2 47.7%
ArenaHard 81.2%
IFEval 87.6%
MMLU 86.1%
MMLU-Pro 71.1%
math
GSM8K 95.8%
MATH 81.8%
reasoning
BIG-Bench Hard 67.2%
DROP 85%
GPQA Diamond 49%
safety
C-SimpleQA 52.2%
SimpleQA 10.3%
TruthfulQA 69.9%

Best result per row highlighted in cyan. Each benchmark links to its definition and sources; each model links to its full scorecard.

Frequently asked questions

Which of these models is best for coding? β–Ά

Qwen2.5 Instruct (72B) has the strongest result on HumanEval among the models compared here. See the code-category rows in the table for the full picture.

How many benchmarks are compared? β–Ά

This comparison covers 16 benchmarks on which at least one of the selected models has a published score.

Where do the benchmark scores come from? β–Ά

Scores are aggregated from official model cards, technical reports and standard public evaluations, and link back to each benchmark's source. They are updated as new results are published.

Explore further

Build a different comparison

Models (0 selected)

Benchmarks (auto)

Select at least two models.