// COMPARISON

Qwen2-57B-A14B

A head-to-head benchmark comparison of Qwen2-57B-A14B across 16 evaluations.

The models

Language Open (Restricted)
Params
57B
Context
β€”
Released
Jun 2024

This report introduces the Qwen2 series, the latest addition to our large language models and large multimodal models. We release a comprehensive suite of found.

Full Qwen2-57B-A14B specs β†’

Benchmark comparison

Benchmark Qwen2-57B-A14B
code
HumanEval 53%
MBPP 71.9%
coding
EvalPlus 57.2
MultiPL-E 49.8
general
C-Eval 87.7%
MMLU 76.5%
MMLU-Pro 43%
knowledge
ARC-Challenge 64.1
CMMLU 88.5
math
GSM8K 80.7%
MATH 43%
reasoning
BIG-Bench Hard 67%
GPQA Diamond 34.3%
HellaSwag 85.2
Winogrande 79.5
safety
TruthfulQA 57.7%

Best result per row highlighted in cyan. Each benchmark links to its definition and sources; each model links to its full scorecard.

Frequently asked questions

Which of these models is best for coding? β–Ά

Qwen2-57B-A14B has the strongest result on HumanEval among the models compared here. See the code-category rows in the table for the full picture.

How many benchmarks are compared? β–Ά

This comparison covers 16 benchmarks on which at least one of the selected models has a published score.

Where do the benchmark scores come from? β–Ά

Scores are aggregated from official model cards, technical reports and standard public evaluations, and link back to each benchmark's source. They are updated as new results are published.

Explore further

Build a different comparison

Models (0 selected)

Benchmarks (auto)

Select at least two models.