// COMPARISON

Qwen2-72B

A head-to-head benchmark comparison of Qwen2-72B across 8 evaluations.

The models

Language Open (Restricted)
Params
72.7B
Context
β€”
Released
Jun 2024

After months of efforts, we are pleased to announce the evolution from Qwen1.5 to Qwen2. This time, we bring to you: - Pretrained and instruction-tuned models o.

Full Qwen2-72B specs β†’

Benchmark comparison

Benchmark Qwen2-72B
code
HumanEval 86%
MBPP 80.2%
general
AlignBench v1.1 8.27
C-Eval 83.8%
IFEval 77.6%
MMLU 82.3%
knowledge
CMMLU 87.47
math
GSM8K 91.1%

Best result per row highlighted in cyan. Each benchmark links to its definition and sources; each model links to its full scorecard.

Frequently asked questions

Which of these models is best for coding? β–Ά

Qwen2-72B has the strongest result on HumanEval among the models compared here. See the code-category rows in the table for the full picture.

How many benchmarks are compared? β–Ά

This comparison covers 8 benchmarks on which at least one of the selected models has a published score.

Where do the benchmark scores come from? β–Ά

Scores are aggregated from official model cards, technical reports and standard public evaluations, and link back to each benchmark's source. They are updated as new results are published.

Explore further

Build a different comparison

Models (0 selected)

Benchmarks (auto)

Select at least two models.