// MODEL CATEGORY

Large language models (LLMs)

Browse every major large language model in one place. This LLM list tracks frontier and open-source foundation models โ€” GPT, Claude, Gemini, Llama, Mistral, Qwen and 400+ more โ€” with parameter counts, context windows, benchmark scores and provider pricing.

2,361 models
AT

Golem

๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ Alan Turing Institute

Oct 1992
Language Proprietary
AI

RAAM

Unknown

Nov 1990 1.5K
Language Proprietary
AI

Bankruptcy-NN

Unknown

Jun 1990 36
Language Proprietary
CM

ALVINN

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Carnegie Mellon University (CMU)

Dec 1989 36.6K
Language Proprietary
SU

Innervator

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Stanford University

Dec 1989 10
Language Proprietary
SU

Truck backer-upper

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Stanford University

Jun 1989 805
Language Proprietary
SU

MADALINE II

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Stanford University

Jul 1988
Language Proprietary
UO

Latent semantic analysis

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ University of Chicago

Apr 1988
Language Proprietary
UO

MLP with back-propagation

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ University of California San Diego

Oct 1986 720
Language Proprietary
CM

Distributed representation NN

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Carnegie Mellon University (CMU)

Aug 1986 432
Language Proprietary
UO

Error Propagation

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ University of California San Diego

Jan 1986
Language Proprietary
MI

Learnability theory of language development

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)

Jul 1984
Language Proprietary
NB

Hierarchical Cognitron

๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต NHK Broadcasting Science Research Laboratories

Apr 1984 9.3K
Language Proprietary
BC

Cognitron

๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต Biological Cybernetics

Sep 1975 21.6K
Language Proprietary
UO

Self-Organizing Nets of Threshold Elements

๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต University of Tokyo

Nov 1972
Language Proprietary
TM

Decision tree adaline

๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต Tokyo Medical and Dental University

May 1969 2.5K
Language Proprietary
SU

MADALINE I

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Stanford University

Jul 1962
Language Proprietary
BL

Linear Decision Functions

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Bell Laboratories

Jun 1962
Language Proprietary
MI

Pandemonium (morse)

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)

Feb 1959
Language Proprietary
CA

Perceptron Mark I

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory

Jan 1957 1K
Language Proprietary
IF

Genetic algorithm

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Institute for Advanced Study

Jul 1954
Language Proprietary

About Large language models (LLMs)

Large language models (LLMs) are the foundation of modern generative AI โ€” general-purpose text models trained on vast corpora that can write, reason, summarise, translate and code. Choosing the best LLM is rarely about a single winner: the best AI model for one task may lag on another. Reasoning-heavy work rewards models that score well on benchmarks like MMLU, GPQA and AIME, while agentic and tool-use workloads care more about instruction following, function calling and long-context recall. When you compare LLMs, weigh raw capability against the practical constraints that decide cost and feasibility โ€” context window, throughput, latency, licensing and price per million tokens. Open-source LLMs such as Llama, Qwen, Mistral and DeepSeek let you self-host and fine-tune, while proprietary frontier models from OpenAI, Anthropic and Google often lead on raw quality. Use our benchmarks to see where each model ranks, and put two candidates side by side with compare before you commit to a provider.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best LLM right now?

There is no single best LLM โ€” it depends on the task. Frontier proprietary models from OpenAI, Anthropic and Google tend to lead on reasoning benchmarks, while open-source LLMs like Llama, Qwen and DeepSeek are best when you need to self-host or fine-tune. Compare candidates on the benchmarks page for your specific workload.

What is the best open source LLM?

The strongest open-source and open-weights LLMs at any given time typically come from the Llama, Qwen, Mistral and DeepSeek families. They can be downloaded, self-hosted and fine-tuned, and the top ones rival proprietary models on many benchmarks. Filter the list above by availability to see current open-weights options.

How do I compare two LLMs?

Use the compare tool to put two models side by side on parameters, context window, availability and benchmark scores, then check the benchmarks page for task-specific rankings such as MMLU, GPQA and coding scores.