// MODEL CATEGORY

Speech AI models

Browse the complete list of Speech AI models. Compare specifications, benchmark scores and provider pricing on GenAIList.

157 models
GO

Conformer

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Google

May 2020 118.8M
Speech Proprietary
GO

ContextNet

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Google

May 2020 112.7M
Speech Proprietary
GO

ContextNet + Noisy Student

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Google

Jan 2020
Speech Proprietary
ZU

FastSpeech

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Zhejiang University (ZJU)

Nov 2019 30.1M
Speech Proprietary
FA

Transformer - LibriVox + Decoding/Rescoring

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Facebook

Nov 2019 296M
Speech Open (Restricted)
IB

Big-Little Net (speech)

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ IBM

Jul 2018 3.3M
Speech Open (Restricted)
GO

Tacotron 2

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Google

Dec 2017
Speech Proprietary
BA

DL scaling speech

๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ Baidu

Dec 2017 193M
Speech Proprietary
GO

Tacotron

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Google

Apr 2017
Speech Proprietary
Microsoft

MS-ensemble-speech-recognition

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Microsoft

Sep 2016 3.2B
Speech Proprietary
Google DeepMind

WaveNet

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Google DeepMind

Sep 2016
Speech Proprietary
JH

LF-MMI

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Johns Hopkins University

Sep 2016 16.6M
Speech Proprietary
UO

Segmental RNN

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ University of Edinburgh

Jun 2016
Speech Proprietary
BR

DeepSpeech2 (English)

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Baidu Research - Silicon Valley AI Lab

Dec 2015 38M
Speech Proprietary
GO

Listen, Attend and Spell

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Google

Aug 2015
Speech Proprietary
CM

TC-DNN-BLSTM-DNN

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Carnegie Mellon University (CMU)

Apr 2015 18.4M
Speech Proprietary
DE

RNN-WER

๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง DeepMind

Jun 2014 26.5M
Speech Proprietary
ID

Clockwork RNN (CW-RNN)

๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ IDSIA

Feb 2014 10K
Speech Proprietary
GO

Multilingual DNN

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Google

May 2013 206.9M
Speech Proprietary
GO

ReLU-Speech

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Google

May 2013 101.7M
Speech Proprietary
GO

DistBelief Speech

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Google

Dec 2012 47.2M
Speech Proprietary
BU

KN5 LM + RNN 400/10 (WSJ)

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Brno University of Technology

Sep 2010 22.2M
Speech Proprietary
BU

RNN 1000/5 + RT09 LM (NIST RT05)

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Brno University of Technology

Sep 2010 77M
Speech Proprietary
BU

RNN 500/10 + RT09 LM (NIST RT05)

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Brno University of Technology

Sep 2010 19.3M
Speech Proprietary
UO

BP-DBN

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ University of Toronto

Jan 2009 18M
Speech Proprietary
ID

BiLSTM for Speech

๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ IDSIA

Aug 2005 152.1K
Speech Proprietary
IS

Fuzzy NN

๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ Indian Statistical Institute

Sep 1992 1.2K
Speech Proprietary
AI

Weight Decay

Unknown

Dec 1991 8.4K
Speech Proprietary
OS

NETtalk reimplementation

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Oregon State University

Jun 1990 27.5K
Speech Proprietary
UO

Speaker-independent vowel classification

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ University of Washington

Nov 1989 3K
Speech Proprietary
AT

Time-delay neural networks

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute

Mar 1989
Speech Proprietary
MU

MLN-ASR

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ McGill University

Aug 1988 10K
Speech Proprietary
PU

NetTalk (dictionary)

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Princeton University

Jun 1987 18.6K
Speech Proprietary
PU

NetTalk (transcription)

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Princeton University

Jun 1987 18.6K
Speech Proprietary
UO

PDP model for serial order

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ University of California San Diego

Jan 1986
Speech Proprietary
MI

Statistical continuous speech recognizer

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)

Apr 1976
Speech Proprietary
IB

LTE speaker verification system

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ IBM

Nov 1966 2.1K
Speech Proprietary

About Speech AI models

This page lists every Speech AI models tracked on GenAIList. When choosing a model, weigh raw capability against practical constraints like context window, latency, licensing and price. Open-weights and open-source models can be self-hosted and fine-tuned, while proprietary models often lead on raw quality. Compare benchmark scores on our benchmarks page and put two candidates head to head with compare.

Frequently asked questions

How do I choose the right model?

Weigh raw capability against practical constraints like context window, latency, licensing and price. Use the benchmarks page to compare rankings and the compare tool to evaluate two candidates side by side.

Where can I see benchmark scores?

Visit the benchmarks page to compare these models on standardised tests, then use the compare tool for a detailed side-by-side of any two models.