// COMPARISON

Ling-1T

A head-to-head benchmark comparison of Ling-1T across 25 evaluations.

The models

Language Open (Restricted)
Params
1T
Context
β€”
Released
Oct 2025

Ling-1T is the first flagship non-thinking model in the Ling 2.0 series, featuring 1 trillion total parameters with β‰ˆ 50 billion active parameters per token. Bu.

Full Ling-1T specs β†’

Benchmark comparison

Benchmark Ling-1T
code
Codeforces Elo 1,901
FullStackBench 56.55%
LiveCodeBench 61.68%
MBPP 96.87%
coding
Aider Benchmark 83.65
MultiPL-E 77.91
general
ArenaHard v2 75.83
C-Eval 92.19%
IFEval 86.11%
MMLU-Pro 82.04%
MMLU-Redux 92.25%
MultiChallenge 58.24%
math
AIME 2024 80.21%
AIME 2025 70.42%
CNMO 2024 79.25%
HMMT February 2025 47.08%
Omni-MATH 74.46
UGMathBench 74.95
reasoning
ARC-AGI-1 43.81
BBEH 47.34
FinanceReasoning 87.45
GPQA Diamond 72.98%
Humanity's Last Exam 7.6%
ZebraLogic 90.8%
tool-use
BFCL v3 69.64%

Best result per row highlighted in cyan. Each benchmark links to its definition and sources; each model links to its full scorecard.

Frequently asked questions

Which of these models is best for coding? β–Ά

Ling-1T has the strongest result on Codeforces Elo among the models compared here. See the code-category rows in the table for the full picture.

How many benchmarks are compared? β–Ά

This comparison covers 25 benchmarks on which at least one of the selected models has a published score.

Where do the benchmark scores come from? β–Ά

Scores are aggregated from official model cards, technical reports and standard public evaluations, and link back to each benchmark's source. They are updated as new results are published.

Explore further

Build a different comparison

Models (0 selected)

Benchmarks (auto)

Select at least two models.